Wednesday, July 9, 2014
Fairer Chance Before Pontius Pilate
JOHOR BARU: FORMER Johor DAP deputy chairman Norman Fernandez said he would have a fairer chance before Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor who had Jesus crucified, than at DAP’s disciplinary committee.
Fernandez quit his party membership after the party leadership voted on Saturday to refer him to a disciplinary panel over his Facebook posts, which they deemed compromising to the party’s image.
“There is no way they are going to give me a fair hearing.”
Fernandez pointed out that during the meeting on Saturday, non-commitee members of the state DAP leaders, namely Liow Cai Tung (Johor Jaya assemblyman), Cheo Yee How (Pengkalan Rinting) and Yeo Tung Siong (Pekan Nanas) cast votes to refer him to the disciplinary panel.
He said although DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang did not vote, his presence at the meeting was enough to cause detriment.
“There is growing hypocrisy among DAP leaders. I have been searching my conscience for some time, possibly before the last general election, and I don’t want to be part of a party that has become subservient to Pas,” he said in reference to DAP’s and Pas’ alliance in the opposition coalition.
Fernandez said he was not planning to join Gerakan as speculated by certain quarters.
“The thought never crossed my mind, and the speculation probably came about because I support multi culturalism.”
Fernandez, who blogs at Normanfernandez.blogspot.com, said he refrained from blogging for the past 3 ½ years because of the fear of antagonising DAP.
However, now that he was just a member of the public, Fernandez said he would start blogging again.
Fernandez served as the Johor deputy chairman for one term.
Some additional info where Fernandez, who joined DAP officially in 1996, also told me that he started supporting DAP when he was 11.
"At the age of 16, I was already helping out the party wherever and whenever I can. When Lim Kit Siang's first book "Time Bombs in Malaysia" came out in 1978, I saved 20 sen of my pocket money everyday until it reached RM10 to buy the book."
Stray Cats and Dogs
This scrawny kitten is a stray. It was found lazing at the Perling wet market in Johor Bahru yesterday. It has been rescued. A vet will have it neutered, then hopefully, volunteers can help to find it a new home.
Another case of "to feed" or "not to feed". There are animal lovers and people who can never understand animal lovers.
I've got a story about stray cats enjoying the Ramadan spirit of sharing but it's so crazy I don't know if it'll see print. Sometimes crazy ideas sell, sometimes not.
And my interview with Dr Edwin Singam on helping stray dogs came out in the NST today.
Dr Edwin Singam, 67, is the deputy chairman of Johor Baru Society For Prevention of Cruelty To Animals. He operates a veterinary clinic in Taman Johor Jaya.
Another case of "to feed" or "not to feed". There are animal lovers and people who can never understand animal lovers.
I've got a story about stray cats enjoying the Ramadan spirit of sharing but it's so crazy I don't know if it'll see print. Sometimes crazy ideas sell, sometimes not.
And my interview with Dr Edwin Singam on helping stray dogs came out in the NST today.
Dr Edwin Singam, 67, is the deputy chairman of Johor Baru Society For Prevention of Cruelty To Animals. He operates a veterinary clinic in Taman Johor Jaya.
I
AM very concerned about the plight of strays dogs and cats. I
understand why the local councils have to get rid of strays, but I hope
they will do it in a more humane way as the whole world can see what we
are doing due to the advancement of technology.
The recent dog culling video showing Johor Baru Central Municipal Council bludgeoning the dogs to death is a case in point.
We need to handle the matter in a civilised manner.
The public, especially cat and dog lovers, can do their part in helping the strays that would not have been one if their owners had not cruelly abandoned them.
Four months ago, a property developer was kind enough to build a small shelter complete with cages on a piece of land for stray dogs.
It is only a small shelter, but that small gesture can buy some time for the strays to find new homes.
It was an exemplary move by the developer, and I hope other developers will also adopt this move.
There are about 10 volunteers helping out at this shelter.
They all have jobs and families to take care of, but they allocate a little time to bring food to the dogs at the shelter.
Meanwhile, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) like Noah’s Ark Natural Animal Sanctuary (Nanas) and the Johor Baru Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) help to neuter or spay the dogs.
The dogs are all picked up from coffee shops or from the streets. It is unsafe for dogs to loiter on the streets.
The dogs’ presence on the street can cause accidents or someone may get bitten, so I can understand why the local councils have to get them off the streets.
But like I said, euthanisation of a stray must be done in a proper manner.
With the concerted effort of the property developer, as NGOs and volunteers, we can reduce the number of strays in the neighbourhood.
But for this exercise to work, we need people or factory owners to adopt these dogs. To give them a new lease of life.
These dogs can become guard dogs at factories.
I am reluctant to tell people the location of this shelter because people have the habit of dumping dogs. We do not want to encourage this. Two months ago, about 30 puppies were dumped outside the shelter.
Fortunately, people adore puppies so we managed to find new homes for the puppies.
It gets harder to rehome a dog as it grows older.
I am also trying to save some dogs at a different shelter. The local council is checking out the shelter as there have been complaints by the neighbours.
The shelter operator — whether she is aware or not — is practicing some form of animal cruelty.
There are just too many dogs in the house and none of them were spayed or neutered. Some of the dogs are tied outside where there are no shade.
And the neighbours have been complaining for some time now.
Due to this, the local council has no alternative but to step in and stop the operation.
My plea to the local council is to let us assist them in the matter. Let us help in rehoming the dogs. I also hope that more people will help us make the rehoming programme work.
For those who would like to chip in and make the programme a success, can call Valerie at 016-755 1893.
The recent dog culling video showing Johor Baru Central Municipal Council bludgeoning the dogs to death is a case in point.
We need to handle the matter in a civilised manner.
The public, especially cat and dog lovers, can do their part in helping the strays that would not have been one if their owners had not cruelly abandoned them.
Four months ago, a property developer was kind enough to build a small shelter complete with cages on a piece of land for stray dogs.
It is only a small shelter, but that small gesture can buy some time for the strays to find new homes.
It was an exemplary move by the developer, and I hope other developers will also adopt this move.
There are about 10 volunteers helping out at this shelter.
They all have jobs and families to take care of, but they allocate a little time to bring food to the dogs at the shelter.
Meanwhile, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) like Noah’s Ark Natural Animal Sanctuary (Nanas) and the Johor Baru Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) help to neuter or spay the dogs.
The dogs are all picked up from coffee shops or from the streets. It is unsafe for dogs to loiter on the streets.
The dogs’ presence on the street can cause accidents or someone may get bitten, so I can understand why the local councils have to get them off the streets.
But like I said, euthanisation of a stray must be done in a proper manner.
With the concerted effort of the property developer, as NGOs and volunteers, we can reduce the number of strays in the neighbourhood.
But for this exercise to work, we need people or factory owners to adopt these dogs. To give them a new lease of life.
These dogs can become guard dogs at factories.
I am reluctant to tell people the location of this shelter because people have the habit of dumping dogs. We do not want to encourage this. Two months ago, about 30 puppies were dumped outside the shelter.
Fortunately, people adore puppies so we managed to find new homes for the puppies.
It gets harder to rehome a dog as it grows older.
I am also trying to save some dogs at a different shelter. The local council is checking out the shelter as there have been complaints by the neighbours.
The shelter operator — whether she is aware or not — is practicing some form of animal cruelty.
There are just too many dogs in the house and none of them were spayed or neutered. Some of the dogs are tied outside where there are no shade.
And the neighbours have been complaining for some time now.
Due to this, the local council has no alternative but to step in and stop the operation.
My plea to the local council is to let us assist them in the matter. Let us help in rehoming the dogs. I also hope that more people will help us make the rehoming programme work.
For those who would like to chip in and make the programme a success, can call Valerie at 016-755 1893.
Tuesday, July 8, 2014
Solitude
Started the day with a 3-minute workout. It was a busy day so three minutes was all I could spare. Besides, three minutes was all it took to snap this picture.
There are so many new retail outlets and cool clubs sprouting in Johor Baru now. So much have changed.
Last July, I wrote about a strange dream I had Interpreting My Snake Dream. Now it looks like that strange dream is turning into a reality. The transformation of Johor has been a favourite topic of late, among bloggers, investors, financiers, politicians, the man on the street.
Some say Legoland Malaysia Resort is so expensive, the locals simply cannot afford the ticket. Another say Legoland was built to attract the tourists. It was not meant for the locals who have other places they can go to.
On the soup kitchen issue. Some are condemning the ban while others support it. Giving food to the poor is a compassionate gesture. On the other hand, it's encouraging sloth.
Why must there be conflicting and opposing views? Does it really make the world more exciting?
There are so many new retail outlets and cool clubs sprouting in Johor Baru now. So much have changed.
Last July, I wrote about a strange dream I had Interpreting My Snake Dream. Now it looks like that strange dream is turning into a reality. The transformation of Johor has been a favourite topic of late, among bloggers, investors, financiers, politicians, the man on the street.
Some say Legoland Malaysia Resort is so expensive, the locals simply cannot afford the ticket. Another say Legoland was built to attract the tourists. It was not meant for the locals who have other places they can go to.
On the soup kitchen issue. Some are condemning the ban while others support it. Giving food to the poor is a compassionate gesture. On the other hand, it's encouraging sloth.
Why must there be conflicting and opposing views? Does it really make the world more exciting?
Different Wavelength
by Nelson Benjamin and Razak Ahmad
sourced from STAR online
Fernandez said in a brief letter to party secretary-general Lim Guan Eng that he no longer shared the party’s ideals and the path taken by its leaders.
“To continue my membership would only constrain and inhibit my freedom to express my views (in a) forthright (manner) and be critical of the party, particularly its continued alliance with PAS,” he wrote in the letter, which was made available to the media.
Earlier, state DAP secretary Gan Peck Cheng said 18 out of 20 state committee members had voted at a meeting on Saturday for the motion to refer Fernandez to the disciplinary panel while two others abstained. Also present at the meeting was DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang.
The motion, said Gan in a statement, was over three Facebook posts by Fernandez, which had compromised the party’s image in the eyes of the public.
The decision, she stressed, was not discussed at the Johor Pakatan Rakyat meeting and was strictly a DAP internal matter.
It is learnt that in a private Facebook post, Fernandez had criticised several DAP leaders as hypocrites for attacking the Prime Minister over his speech on the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil) but remaining quiet when the PAS president’s son-in-law voiced support for the militant group.
Fernandez also allegedly insulted two DAP leaders.
It is learnt that the post was removed before the resolution – which Fernandez had described as making a “mountain out of a mole hill” – was passed on Saturday.
“Whatever I write in my blog or Facebook is my own thoughts and feelings,” he said.
PETALING JAYA: There is a fallout in DAP over its collaboration with PAS, which has led to disciplinary action against former Johor DAP deputy chairman and his subsequent resignation.
Norman Fernandez is no stranger to controversy for attacking his party’s ties with PAS due to the Islamist party’s insistence on hudud.
A vocal critic of PAS’ hudud plan, Fernandez called on voters last year to reject the Islamist party just days before the general election, saying that the country could not gamble its future with PAS.
In a reaction to the latest development, MCA publicity bureau chief Datuk Chai Kim Sen said DAP’s action against Fernandez showed that the Opposition party was trying to “curry favour” with its partner PAS.
DAP, said Chai, had been telling non-Muslims that it was against hudud but never took concrete steps to lodge an official protest with PAS or stated its opposition at Pakatan Rakyat supreme council meetings.
“DAP has instead made Fernandez its ‘sacrificial lamb’ for speaking up against PAS.
“The disciplinary action against Fernandez shows that DAP will not offend PAS for political interest and that it is also unable to tell right from wrong,” said Chai in a statement here yesterday.
Chai said that according to news reports, Fernandez had condemned DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng and PAS for betraying Pakatan by allowing PAS to go ahead with its hudud plan in April despite the lack of an agreement on the issue in its common policy framework.
He described Fernandez as “politically courageous” for daring to speak up against hudud despite the party’s fear of objecting to PAS.
“Obviously, DAP is no longer able to tolerate different voices and it oppresses those who do not share the same view,” said Chai, who is also MCA deputy national organising secretary.
Sunday, July 6, 2014
We Can Save The Strays
Doesn't this picture just melt your heart and make you go Awwww???
This is a stray dog who got so attached to a volunteer at a temporary shelter for dogs. The shelter was set up by a property developer, and the volunteers go there to feed the dogs while efforts are made to re-home the strays. The dogs are neutered or spayed at the shelter.
This is a beautiful programme. These dogs can be sent to a new home or industrial sites. But volunteers have to monitor the dogs to ensure that they are adapting well in their new homes. Can dog lovers unite for this wonderful cause?
This is one way of getting strays off the streets --- so that they don't end up in a dog catchers' truck or the cooking pot. Or other unimaginable horrors like starvation, maggot infestation or being knocked down by a vehicle.
And look at the dog listening so attentively as I was getting information from the volunteer.
Property developers, factory owners, farm operators and dog lovers can all play a part to make this work.
Views and suggestions are welcomed. Dog lovers, can we save the strays?
Saturday, July 5, 2014
Tak Rasa Bersalah Ke?
I need to vent.
This incident happened two days ago.
My KL bosses were asking me about some stories. I checked the slug book and found that there were slug numbers taken for the stories so I thought the thing had been done by my colleague. I gave the slug numbers to my bosses so that they can retrieve the stories.
The next day at around noon, there was a reminder to send the same stories. So I put a gentle reminder in the JB Bureau group Whatsapp to please send the said stories to KL.
That same day at 5pm, KL was rushing me to send those stories again as one of the stories was going into print. They were waiting ....
I confidently said it was sent already but if KL still didn't receive them, then I would just have to re-send. When I opened the slugs, to my shock, what stared back at me was a blank screen. At that time I still thought, maybe the stories were done but had not been saved or had been accidentally deleted.
I called up my colleague, who told me "DIDN'T DO". I got very angry and voiced it out in the group whatsapp. Ok, maybe I did not do it with tact. But I was angry at the time.
The next day. I had forgotten about the incident already, and I whatsapp my colleague like normal. However, I could detect some difference when he replied to my message.
Doesn't he feel bad for being irresponsible? I don't go around "disturbing" others. I have my own things to do and worry about.
But when KL bosses look for me, I look for you. Why the hell are you angry with me? Tak rasa bersalah ke?
Now, a separate matter. I ordered this item in May. The salesman said he could have it delivered to my house. Not a problem since I live quite near to the retail outlet. He also said he would call once the item arrived at his shop.
Yesterday I only knew the item had arrived after I called the shop. I decided to drive to the retail outlet. I didn't know the gross weight of the item was 20.5kg. He said he could deliver it but only on a Monday or Tuesday. I work this Monday and Tuesday, so it isn't convenient for me.
It turned out he couldn't even deliver the thing to my car because he said he was alone in the shop. Fine.
Fortunately, a security guard of the shopping mall gallantly loaded the item from the trolley to my car
After having made all the sweet promises to get me to buy, shouldn't the salesman try to be more accommodating? If I hadn't paid the money yet, maybe things would be different. Tak rasa bersalah ke?
Okay, I have vented. I am going to take a nap now.
I don't think I need to make any apologies to my co-worker for my sudden outburst, but if I have hurt anyone's delicate feelings ... I AM SORRY.
This incident happened two days ago.
My KL bosses were asking me about some stories. I checked the slug book and found that there were slug numbers taken for the stories so I thought the thing had been done by my colleague. I gave the slug numbers to my bosses so that they can retrieve the stories.
The next day at around noon, there was a reminder to send the same stories. So I put a gentle reminder in the JB Bureau group Whatsapp to please send the said stories to KL.
That same day at 5pm, KL was rushing me to send those stories again as one of the stories was going into print. They were waiting ....
I confidently said it was sent already but if KL still didn't receive them, then I would just have to re-send. When I opened the slugs, to my shock, what stared back at me was a blank screen. At that time I still thought, maybe the stories were done but had not been saved or had been accidentally deleted.
I called up my colleague, who told me "DIDN'T DO". I got very angry and voiced it out in the group whatsapp. Ok, maybe I did not do it with tact. But I was angry at the time.
The next day. I had forgotten about the incident already, and I whatsapp my colleague like normal. However, I could detect some difference when he replied to my message.
Doesn't he feel bad for being irresponsible? I don't go around "disturbing" others. I have my own things to do and worry about.
But when KL bosses look for me, I look for you. Why the hell are you angry with me? Tak rasa bersalah ke?
Now, a separate matter. I ordered this item in May. The salesman said he could have it delivered to my house. Not a problem since I live quite near to the retail outlet. He also said he would call once the item arrived at his shop.
Yesterday I only knew the item had arrived after I called the shop. I decided to drive to the retail outlet. I didn't know the gross weight of the item was 20.5kg. He said he could deliver it but only on a Monday or Tuesday. I work this Monday and Tuesday, so it isn't convenient for me.
It turned out he couldn't even deliver the thing to my car because he said he was alone in the shop. Fine.
Fortunately, a security guard of the shopping mall gallantly loaded the item from the trolley to my car
After having made all the sweet promises to get me to buy, shouldn't the salesman try to be more accommodating? If I hadn't paid the money yet, maybe things would be different. Tak rasa bersalah ke?
Okay, I have vented. I am going to take a nap now.
I don't think I need to make any apologies to my co-worker for my sudden outburst, but if I have hurt anyone's delicate feelings ... I AM SORRY.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)