- sourced from NST online
Thursday, August 28, 2014
Thrill Seekers Head To Desaru
- sourced from NST online
Malaysia, My Home, My Country
sourced from NST online
by Chuah Bee Kim
STOP a youth anywhere and ask him how many stripes are there in the Jalur Gemilang or why is our national flag called the Jalur Gemilang and what do the colours represent.
I doubt many will have the correct answer, let alone be able to answer the question confidently.
When flags are being hoisted in residences and business premises, do they do it with pride and love for the country or are they following the crowd?
You have a flag, so I should also have one.
Are teachers and parents teaching the children about the colours of the Jalur Gemilang, its history, the protocols and etiquette of flying a Jalur Gemilang?
This year, I have yet to come across a tattered or worn-out flag, and I am glad.
I have seen such flags in previous years which is a disgrace. Flags that are raised should not be faded or dirty. The same goes for the state flags.
If we truly love our country, we should not be keeping flags that look like rags.
I remember writing in 2010 about a Johor flag which was used to wrap papayas on a tree.
That was an ultimate insult. I did a search on Google and found out that if a flag is to be flown at a certain spot, the static flag pole must not be less than 6.1m high.
If the flag is used as a decorative piece or flown for a certain period, the pole must be at least 3m high and no part of the flag must be allowed to touch the ground.
Did you know that a static flag is only allowed to be flown from 7am to 7pm, unless there is a floodlight on?
Flags at government departments are to be raised when the offices open in the morning and lowered after office hours.
In schools, the flag is to be raised in the morning and lowered after the last class.
When the national or state flag is flown from houses or shops, it should face the road and be secured on a pole at a 45-degree angle.
If two flags are flown, the Malaysian flag must be on the left side of the premises.
In Johor, the late Sultan Iskandar decreed in 1985 that the Johor flag must be given prominence and flown on the right side of the Jalur Gemilang.
However, on Merdeka Day, the Jalur Gemilang takes precedence and is flown on the right side of the state flag. If there are three flag poles, the Johor flag is flown in the centre, the Malaysian flag on the right while the departmental, corporate or institutional flag is flown on the left.
On Merdeka Day, the Malaysian flag is raised in the centre and the Johor flag on the right.
During the Merdeka celebrations or official federal events, the Johor flag is raised after every third Malaysian flag is raised.
The cluster of miniature flags on a utility post also follows the same arrangement.
All flags used for decoration are to be removed two weeks after the event.
All the above were taken from a 2010 article.
I think in other countries, like Indonesia, for instance, the Sang Saka Merah-Putih (The Heirloom Red-and-White) or Bendera Merah-Putih (The Red-and-White Flag) is treated with utmost respect by its residents.
The mentality of the Indonesians and Malaysians are poles apart.
I am not sure about patriotism, but the mentality of Indonesians and those of Malaysians really differs when it comes to direct selling.
Allow me to stray a bit from the subject of patriotism.
Indonesians can make more money in a direct-selling entrepreneurship than a local because of the former’s drive, commitment and passion for the brand.
A local direct-selling agent shared this with me recently.
She said her downlines who are Indonesians really showed all the qualities I mentioned earlier, while her local downlines only treat the business like a part-time venture.
“I have been trying to change the people’s mindset for a long time, but the locals, maybe because they have had an easy life, would never go the extra mile to succeed in their direct-selling business,” said my friend.
Now back to patriotism. I believe some rules are not to be followed rigidly.
I am thinking of the family of five which recently dined at an eatery which prohibited guests to bring in outside food.
Four members of the family had ordered food from the restaurant but an elderly member of the family could only eat home-cooked meals, so when the family took out the food container for the senior citizen, they were allegedly asked to leave the eatery. The nation is turning 57. Can’t we exercise some common sense or at least courtesy?
And on a last note, please be kind to animals.
It really reflects badly on the nation if an animal’s welfare is not well taken care of.
The recent incident at a Hong Kong subway where a mongrel was killed when a train rammed into it has put the city in a very bad light.
The train commuters and staff of the subway were aware that there was a mongrel that had strayed onto the tracks but no one did anything to save the poor dog.
Our actions reflect our upbringing, our education and our beloved country will be judged by the world at large, now especially in the age of the Internet.
Happy Merdeka, folks!
Summer Vacation
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Khalid did it by the book
WHAT transpired at Istana Bukit Kayangan yesterday was in contrast to the dramatic way PKR attempted to oust Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim from the menteri besar’s post.
Maintaining decorum, the rule of law and even good manners was how it was in the Selangor palace when Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah consented to give an audience to Khalid for the latter to present the facts of the state leadership crisis and his resignation as menteri besar.
There was no spectacular dissolution of the state legislative assembly to pave the way for a snap election, nor was there an abrupt sacking of Khalid. The sultan, instead, wanted everyone to follow the law and established conventions to settle the crisis.
Sultan Sharafuddin had decreed that since the loose coalition of PKR, DAP and Pas claimed that they had the majority in the state assembly, they should nominate a new menteri besar and Khalid concurred by tendering his resignation, each of the three parties should observe the established convention of presenting to the palace at least three names from among Pakatan assemblymen for the post.
The sultan had also insisted for the state not to go rudderless and told Khalid to remain at his post until his successor had been chosen from among those to be proposed by Pakatan.
Typical of Khalid, he followed procedures and, being a loyal subject of the sultan, agreed to stay in office until his replacement had been chosen.
There was no throwing of tantrums, nor angry threats as compared with what went on during the weekend at the PKR congress in Shah Alam when the party’s Wanita chief, Zuraida Kamaruddin, described any attempt to dissolve the state legislative assembly as “nonsense and against the Constitution”.
Even newly minted party vice-president Rafizi Ramli warned Khalid not to advise the sultan to dissolve the assembly at the risk of “losing the last shred of decency left in him”.
As Khalid told the packed press conference after his audience with the sultan, he presented the facts of the crisis to the ruler and then submitted himself to the monarch’s discretion. Nothing more, nothing less.
Nonetheless, underneath the layers of subtleties of the sultan’s decree and Khalid’s proper response, there was a clear hint that PKR, in its haste to replace Khalid with its president, Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, had not observed the proper protocol in a matter of such importance.
This was especially so when PKR and its allies made it clear to the palace that it had to accept no one else other than Dr Wan Azizah for the menteri besar post when they sent a letter to that effect to Sultan Sharafuddin on Aug 15.
Among the less subtle observers, the move could even be deemed as an attempt by Pakatan to force the sultan to abide by its wishes on the matter.
It was as if everything had to be done in a confrontational manner and in bad faith to settle the impasse.
The ball is now in Pakatan’s court and it will be for the coalition to choose whether it wants to continue playing hardball or toe the line of laws and conventions as decreed by the sultan.
It should be noted that Sultan Sharafuddin’s insistence on Pakatan observing the convention of presenting at least three candidates for the menteri besar’s post could also mean that the ruler intends for all sides in the dispute to revert to Selangor’s unwritten traditions in choosing the state’s chief executive.
It should also be noted that tradition also points to another interesting fact — Khalid and most former menteris besar were chosen from among assemblymen who hailed from the Selangor Malay heartland, in particular Kuala Selangor.
It is the same convention observed to a large extent in the selection of Johor menteris besar, who have mostly come from the state’s Malay heartland of Muar.
If PKR and its allies are to follow that tradition, they should, therefore, name at least one person from that area as those previously mentioned — Dr Wan Azizah and her party deputy Azmin Ali — are not Selangor-born.Perhaps one name that should be considered is that of Dr Idris Ahmad, PKR’s Ijok assemblyman, who is said to be well-liked by the sultan.
The tussle over the Selangor menteri besar post is still open to any conclusion as of now, except that the sultan had made it clear that it must be reached without all the mess which had earlier caused much discomfort among the people of Selangor ever since the so-called “Kajang Move” was initiated by PKR to oust Khalid.
Sunday, August 24, 2014
Wife Says
sourced from NST online
"It Is Never My Wish To Hold Positions"
by Hana Naz Harun
SHAH ALAM: PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail said it was not her wish to hold a position in the state, saying that she was only doing it for the party.
In her winding up speech during the PKR National Congress, Dr Wan Azizah she did not ask to contest in the Kajang by-election or to be nominated as Selangor Menteri Besar, but did so for the party’s struggles.
“Truthfully, this is not what my heart desires, but this is our party’s struggle.
“If this is what the party needs, then I will step forward. If this is the responsibility that is given to me, I will accept, even with a heavy heart.
“This is not what I wanted, I did not ask for this,” she said.
Last week, the Pakatan leadership had unanimously agreed that Dr Wan Azizah, will be the only Pakatan candidate for the menteri besar post.
Dr Wan Azizah had claimed the majority of the state assembly, when 30 Pakatan assemblymen signed a statutory declaration in support of her nomination as menteri besar on Aug 15.
She also called for party members to unite after the recently concluded party elections which had been marred by violent incidences and allegations of money politics.
Winning and losing was nature, Dr Wan Azizah said, and urged members to accept the decision.
“Losing (in the party elections) does not mean you lose in everything.
“Don’t be disheartened by (such) distractions until we forget our true purpose and mission. We have been fighting for so long,” she added.